Claydar on new websites
Claydar visitor tracking / session analytics from clay.com
- Sites using Claydar
- 112
- since Apr 2026
- Last 30 days
- 0.0%
-
of new sites, to Oct 19
no change on the 30 days before - Last 7 days
- 0.0%
- of new sites, 7-day average
no change on the week before
| In our data since | Apr 2026 |
|---|---|
| Last seen | Oct 19, 2026 |
| Website | clay.com |
What we found
- Claydar appeared on about 22 new sites in the last 30 days.[1]
- Nine in ten new Claydar sites also use Vector.
Share of new sites using Claydar
The line is the 7-day average share of new sites that use Claydar, since 10 September.
Who uses Claydar
| Type | Sites | Share | Bar |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marketing | 25 | 33.3% | |
| AI | 17 | 22.7% | |
| Developer Tools | 12 | 16.0% | |
| Productivity | 6 | 8.0% | |
| Health | 4 | 5.3% | |
| Hiring & HR | 4 | 5.3% | |
| Finance | 3 | 4.0% | |
| Content | 1 | 1.3% | |
| Crypto | 1 | 1.3% | |
| Design | 1 | 1.3% | |
| E-commerce | 1 | 1.3% |
| Country | Sites | Share | Bar |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | 70.8% | ||
| 2 | 8.3% | ||
| 1 | 4.2% | ||
| 1 | 4.2% | ||
| 1 | 4.2% | ||
| 1 | 4.2% | ||
| 1 | 4.2% |
| Ending | Sites | Share | Bar |
|---|---|---|---|
| .com | 34 | 30.4% | |
| .ai | 26 | 23.2% | |
| .io | 23 | 20.5% | |
| .co | 5 | 4.5% | |
| .so | 3 | 2.7% | |
| .es | 2 | 1.8% | |
| .net | 2 | 1.8% | |
| .online | 2 | 1.8% | |
| .org | 2 | 1.8% | |
| .uk | 2 | 1.8% | |
| .xyz | 2 | 1.8% |
| Sites | Green | Bar |
|---|---|---|
| Claydar | 35% | |
| All new sites | 47% |
Analytics on new sites
| # | Movement | Tool | Share of category | Bar | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – |
|
43.1% | ||
| 2 | – |
|
15.7% | ||
| 3 | ▼1 |
|
10.4% | ||
| 4 | ▲1 |
|
10.4% | ||
| 5 | – |
|
6.9% | ||
| … | |||||
| 124 | ▼48 |
|
<0.1% | ||
All-time shares across the new sites we track: of all of them, and of the sites using any Analytics tool. The most common alternatives to Claydar on new websites are Cloudflare Web Analytics and Vercel Analytics. Among September launches it ranked #167 in Analytics, down from #119 in August. All 1508 in Analytics
Often used with Claydar
| Tool | Sites with both | vs all new sites |
|---|---|---|
|
|
96 | 8506x |
|
|
43 | 251x |
|
|
54 | 235x |
|
|
53 | 18x |
|
|
55 | 8.6x |
Tools that turn up far more often on Claydar sites than on new sites in general, and how many times as common each one is there.
Recently launched products built on Claydar
60 of the 112 sites using Claydar are product launches we list individually. The other 52 are new business and personal sites: they count towards the figures above but are not listed here. A watch sends them to you.
-
readywhen
app.readywhen.ai
-
Bulbul V4 Flash
sarvam.ai
-
Lleverage
lleverage.ai
-
Confidence by Spotify
confidence.spotify.com
-
Weave
weaveos.com
-
Griffin by Tavus
tavus.io
Showing the most recent 12 of 60.
Watches, exports and the API give you all 112 sites using Claydar, from £15 a month.
Notes
- These figures cover websites that went live since April 2026, not the web as a whole.
- Country comes from what each site says about itself, such as a company registration, legal terms or a phone number, not just its domain ending. We count a country only where it is stated plainly enough to be sure: a governing-law clause or company registration number on a legal page, a phone country code, or a country domain ending. Sites that publish none are not counted at all.
- Green hosting is the share whose web host The Green Web Foundation lists as running on green energy, among sites checked since 1 April 2026, against the same share for every new site we checked over that time. Data from The Green Web Foundation.
How this page is made
FirstSited looks at each new website near the day it goes live and records what it was built with. We do not go back later, so these figures describe what sites launch with, not what they run today. A site counts towards Claydar when we detect Claydar on it at that look.
Every share on this page is a proportion of the new sites we were tracking at the time. Sites we found across the wider web count towards the figures, but only product launches are listed by name. How we detect technologies · How we find new sites